144 Half Cells Monocrystalline Solar Panel

Welcome to Oushang Solar! Below is our 144 Half Cells Solar Panel (Monocrystalline), including 390W, 400W, 410W, 455W, 525W, 535W, and 550W Solar Panels. Detailed specifications are provided in the table below. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions!

OUSHANG SOLAR are exported all over the world and different industries with quality first. Our belief is to provide our customers with more and better high value-added products. Let's create a better future together.

Contact us to discuss your requirements of 144 Cell 535w Solar Panel. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.

Model OS-HM72-390 OS-HM72-400 OS-HM72-410 Cell MONO-Half Cell MONO-half cell MONO-half cell Max Power 390W 400W 410W Max Power Voltage 40.48V 41.08V 41.64V Max Power Current 9.63A 9.74A 9.82A Open Circuit Voltage 48.58V 49.30V 50.10V Short Circuit Current 10.13A 10.24A 10.32A Number of Cells 144(6*24) 144(6*24) 144(6*24) Size of Cells (mm) 156*78 156*78 156*78 Dimensions(mm) *996*35 *996*35 *996*35 Maximum system voltage VDC Junction Box Protection IP67 Cables 4mm2 Connector MC4 Max wind load Pa Max snow load Pa Operating Temperature -40℃~+85℃ Power Tolerance ±3% Cell Half Cell MONO No. of cells 144 (6*24) Rated Maximum Power (Pmax) 455W Junction Box IP67 Maximum System Voltage V DC Operating Temperature -40℃～+85℃ Connectors  MC4 TYPE OS-HM72-525W OS-HM72-535W OS-HM72-550W Rated Maximum Power (Pmax )[W] 525 535 550 Open Circuit Voltage(Voc)[V] 49.15 49.45 49.9 Maximum  Power Voltage (Vmp) [V] 41.15 41.41 41.96 Short Circuit Current (Isc) [A] 13.65 13.79 14 Maximum Power Current (Imp) [A] 12.76 12.9 13.11 Maximum system voltage VDC Junction Box Protection IP67 Cables 4mm2 Connector MC4 Max wind load Pa Max snow load Pa Operating Temperature -40℃~+85℃ Power Tolerance ±3%

Please leave contact information, our professional staff will contact you the first time!

How Many Solar Panels Do You Need To Power Your House? Are Solar Panels Worth It In ?

Are you interested in learning more about 144 Cell Solar Panel? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!

True at the point where that paper was published.

Bifacial panels came a long way since .

We are currently testing panels here at my University and they are much better on the rear.

I don't have the final results yet, we need at least 2 years of data to have somewhat unbiased results.

Some of the preliminary test we did was just put two identical panels side by side, one with the front into the sun and the other with the back.

The power curves look virtual identical. The rear is trailing, but the difference is small. A couple of watt hours each day.

Still, do your own research, various manufacturers and models may differ.

In June there was a news article about Longi achieving the best bifaciality factor of any panel. I believe this was related to commercially available panels, not laboratory achievements.
At that time, I had some professional calculations done. I anticipated the bifaciality factor would improve over time, so I selected a bifaciality factor of 83.5% for the calculation. This was a slightly better factor than what had been achieved by Longi or anyone to my knowledge.

The calculation aimed to symmetrically match the output of both sides of a vertical bifacial panel so that an optimally sized MPPT could be used. The calculation was done for the Summer solstice at 28.7 degrees south latitude.
This was the result:
The two sides of the fence will produce the same amount of power if the good side is oriented 315° from North, which happens to be exactly Northwest.
I don't know if latitude influenced the calculation, but presumably the higher the bifaciality factor the closer to true North the panels should be aligned.

My panels have anti-glare finishing on them and I have never noticed any glaring problem with them. That doesn't mean there wouldn't be any complaints if they were installed this way in some more crowded place.

yes a reflective panel would be bad for performance, most all newer panels are pretty dull and almost matt black.

The two sides of the fence will produce the same amount of power if the good side is oriented 315° from North, which happens to be exactly Northwest.
I don't know if latitude influenced the calculation, but presumably the higher the bifaciality factor the closer to true North the panels should be aligned.

That is very interesting calculation, I have to run that numbers. In our test setup we have them running north-south to true north.
Two MPPTs - one has it's panels "Upside" to the west the other to east.

Interesting side observation in Florida is - it gets cloudy and raining in the afternoon, subtropical climate.
So the array with the upside facing west is producing less overall. We have clear mornings till early afternoon.

Whatever results the study will bring - we already know that it will be primary applicable for climates like ours. In a dry climate - with most of the sunshine in the afternoon - you will likely see different results.

I anticipated the bifaciality factor would improve over time, so I selected a bifaciality factor of 83.5% for the calculation

I would guess we are seeing at least that value, with commercial bifacial panels. No hard data yet, one year is just not enough to say anything with confidence.

those are all valid concerns and since this a new application and tech shall be addressed.

Total racking cost should be cheaper, Wiring cost ? we don't know, Where do you put the inverters? Do you go directly to batteries ?

In some areas - you do not have the space to put a perfectly angled south mounted system. Then you have to make the decision, - no solar or solar which is not as efficient per panel. Which is just a cost decision. When installed panel prices are cheap enough and you are space constrained - total efficiency per doesn't matter as much.
I rather have a solar fence - then a privacy fence - which costs similar.

I'm not aware of any privacy fence that cost $100/ft. For large fences, like on a farm, our cost is closer to $0.10/ft (for electric fences) or $1 or two a foot for 5 strand barb wire - installed.

Of course for the choice of vertical or nothing, vertical make sense.

Inverters go next to the batteries unless your just doing a grid-tied, battery free, installation.

Curious about quantities of MPPT charge controllers needed so lets run some math: Assuming 550W XXL panels to minimize mounting cost, lets use this panel as an example: nominal power of 412.5 watts, max open circuit voltage 50V. Calculated nominal amperage of 412.5/12 = 34 amps. OK, thats going to get clipped by the 13amp maximum power rating Presuming we want to minimize component lets use this MPPT controller: 100amp charge rate, 250V max open circuit voltage, 12/24/48V operations. Presuming we want to minimize wiring cost that gives us 48V operation, so each set of (4) panels in series passes with a max open circuit voltage of 200V. If we waste a bit of peak power, we could parallel (8) of these 48V serial panels into one MPPT controller for a total of (32) panels per controller.

These panels are 90 x 45 inches in size - presuming a horizontal 2 panel height design, plus a couple of inches for mounting hardware, and a 100 ft run would take 13 sets of panels (26 total panels). Hmmm, that doesn't work out great, goal is 32 panels, or at least something in a multiple of 4. So f**k it, lets make a section 123 feet long so we can maximize utilization of components. So, 17 mounting poles @, oh, $140 each plus tax, call it $150*17=$. Panels cost $290 each, plus shipping. So at least $300*32=$. MPPT controller seems to run around $600, so we are at something like $12,800 so far plus or minus perhaps 10-20%.

Now the tricky part - wiring. 48V @ 100 amps. Playing with numbers on this calculator would imply 2/0 copper wiring for 48V, 100amp, 100 foot run with a 3.25% voltage drop (shooting for 3% or less, which is close enough). 250 feet pushes it with 4/0 copper having a 5.11% drop (not great, not horrible). But lets assume you can place the charge controller within 100 feet of one end of the fence. Hmmm, can't do that though, because we have 123 feet of fencing interconnected already. So you could, I suppose, wire the fence with 2/0 copper with a 4% voltage loss, then wire to the controller with 4/0 copper for an additional 2% drop, or wire the entire 123+100=223 foot run with 4/0 copper for a 4.5% voltage drop. Switch that to Aluminum and your at a sickly 7.18% voltage drop and getting worse if you are more than 100 ft between the fence and the controller. So lets say 4/0 copper. Ballpark (here) that's $ per 500' roll, which can be cut in half with a bit left over. Actually not as bad as I thought.

Total cost for major components is therefore $+$=$. That's presuming your doing it yourself and have no labor charges, and is missing other mounting hardware and things I'm sure I've forgotten, but still its $134.36/ft. A wooden fence is going to cost about 1/10th of that, but will require maintenance every few years. Chain link fence would be somewhat similar (fencing is cheap, poles and top rails and tension bars, etc. not so much so). Big difference.

Oh, but you will be generating power! 32 panels at 13 amps ~= va, say at an overestimated 90% system efficiency = va. But because we are vertical, we can only hope for about 67% panel output, so va for, what?, 4 hours a day. That's 12KWh/day, unrealistically 365 days a year, for KWh/year. At $0.15/KWh, that's $657/year in power savings on a $ investment, for a 4% return on equity, so a 25 year pay back, which is pretty much the design life of the system. YMMV. Tax credits may apply. Batteries not included. ...

Presuming we want to minimize wiring cost that gives us 48V operation, so each set of (4) panels in series passes with a max open circuit voltage of 200V.

why would you do that? You want to have the highest voltage possible going to the MPPT to avoid line losses. My inverter has max input voltage of 480V an I am intending to use most of it. So 8 x 50V Panels in series

There are newer MPPTs with 600V input out there. If you are doing grid connect you can get 800V input MPPT inverters.

wooden fence is going to cost about 1/10th of that, but will require maintenance every few years. Chain link fence would be somewhat similar (fencing is cheap, poles and top rails and tension bars, etc. not so much so). Big difference.

look into PVC privacy fencing. A 6x 8 panel is $140. Lets try compare compare similar maintenance free things.


535W Bi-facial Palette of 28 $ - $240 per panel.

535 Watt Heliene Solar Panels Bifacial *Pallet Qty Only* - 28 Pieces

Model # 132HC M10 SL Bifacial Watts 490W VOC 49.97V ISC 13.48A Cell Type 144 Half Cut Monocrystalline Panel Dimensions 89.72L x 44.65W x 1.38H" Spec Sheet DOWNLOAD
2x EG4 XP Inverter ( 4x w MPPT) https://signaturesolar.com/eg4-xp-off-grid-inverter-split-phase/

Now the tricky part - wiring. 48V @ 100 amps. Playing with numbers on this calculator would imply 2/0 copper wiring for 48V, 100amp, 100 foot run with a 3.25% voltage drop (shooting for 3% or less, which is close enough). 250 feet pushes it with 4/0 copper having a 5.11% drop (not great, not horrible). But lets assume you can place the charge controller within 100 feet of one end of the fence. Hmmm, can't do that though, because we have 123 feet of fencing interconnected already. So you could, I suppose, wire the fence with 2/0 copper with a 4% voltage loss, then wire to the controller with 4/0 copper for an additional 2% drop, or wire the entire 123+100=223 foot run with 4/0 copper for a 4.5% voltage drop. Switch that to Aluminum and your at a sickly 7.18% voltage drop and getting worse if you are more than 100 ft between the fence and the controller. So lets say 4/0 copper. Ballpark (here) that's $ per 500' roll, which can be cut in half with a bit left over. Actually not as bad as I thought.

you should not do any of that- the MPPT is supposed to sit directly above the battery - less then 5 ft away.

You use thin AWG10 MC4 connector wires at a high voltage 400-600V - going to the MPPT then a very short run to the batteries. Those things are less then $1 per foot - so $500 for a 500ft spool.

That's 12KWh/day, unrealistically 365 days a year,

You calculation is way off.
I am getting 4kWh per day out of TWO 460w panels averaged over the last 3 years.
Meaning = 2 kWh per 460w panel / day

32x 550w = 17,600W - lets de-rate that because vertical - to a 15KW system (easier math)

Depending on location you are looking at 20-25,000 kWh annual according to the solar atlas.

Lets double check that math with my 2kWh/day per 460W panel

2kWh x 32 Panels x 365 = 23,360 kWH and I got smaller panels. So you are likely closer to 25.000 kWh annual out of the 32 panels you are suggesting.